Public records library › 26-555 › 04_08_2026_lfalcy@ci.moscow.id.us_RE_ washer_dryers.pdf

Extracted text

Machine-extracted text layer of the file above, shown verbatim for search and reading. Tables and slides lose their layout. The original file governs.

# 04_08_2026_lfalcy@ci.moscow.id.us_RE_ washer_dryers.pdf
- path: 04_08_2026_lfalcy@ci.moscow.id.us_RE_ washer_dryers.pdf
- type: PDF
- pages/slides/sheets: 1
- extraction method: text layer
- unreadable pages: none
## Page 1
Sent: 
8/4/2026 8:15:13 AM
From: 
Lucy Falcy <lfalcy@ci.moscow.id.us
To: 
"Nichoel Baird Spencer" 
Cc: 
Bcc: 
Importance: Normal
Subject:
RE: washer/dryers
Nichoel,
Thank you. So…they can just ask? In an email? 
 
Except for one thing that would meet neither code, I believe the plans would meet the new code. 
 
Lucy 
 
From: Nichoel Baird Spencer <nspencer@ci.moscow.id.us> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2026 8:09 AM
To: Lucy Falcy <lfalcy@ci.moscow.id.us>
Subject: RE: washer/dryers
 
Lucy, 
Plans are reviewed per the code that was in effect at the time of submittal.  If they wish to elect to utilize the 
new code that is a request from the applicant but must be done universally, they can not elect to use part of 
the old and part of the new.  
 
From: Lucy Falcy <lfalcy@ci.moscow.id.us> 
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2026 8:06 AM
To: Nichoel Baird Spencer <nspencer@ci.moscow.id.us>
Subject: washer/dryers
 
Nichoel,
 
I am reviewing a set of plans that was submitted earlier in the year and has two washer/dryer sets in a 
dwelling unit. This wasn’t allowed in the first review round but we allow two w/d sets now.  
 
I just wanted to confirm my understanding that we continue to review the plans under the code/interpretation 
it was submitted under. Is there any way to incorporate the new provisions without making the applicant 
withdraw and resubmit? 
 
Lucy