Your Money
Overview
18 years of budget data at a glance.
Revenue
Where the city's money comes from.
Spending
Expenditures by department and fund.
Property Taxes
Levy history and rates.
Fees
Utility rates and fee comparison.
FY2027 Budget
Live tracker of the budget process.
Money Explained
Plain-language finance guide.
City Operations
Funds
All city funds and balances.
Debt & Capital
Bonds, debt service, and CIP.
Development
Building permits and construction.
City Plans
Comprehensive plan and strategic goals.
Comparisons
Peer Cities
Moscow vs. Idaho cities.
Money Flow
Interactive fund transfer network.
Data Sources
All source documents.
Emissions Scale
Moscow's CO2 vs. the world.
Tools
Calculator
Estimate your property tax bill.
Simulator
Model tax increase scenarios.
State Revenue
State shared revenue trends.
Explainers
Plain-language finance guides.
Priorities
Campaign platform backed by data.

Feedback

Found an error? Have a question? Let us know.

East City Park site and circulation plan showing proposed stage location
Site plan from Design West's proposal for the $885,000 stage replacement
Civic Transparency Report

East City Park Stage:
What the Records Show

$885,000 in public funds. No public hearing.
18 non-public or restricted-access meetings.

$885,000

That is how much Moscow is spending to replace a park stage that volunteers built and maintained for 40 years. The money comes from the City's Capital Fund.

Source: FY2026 Budget, Capital Fund.

That is roughly $35 for every man, woman, and child in Moscow.

The Peter Basoa Stage at East City Park was originally built by community volunteers. It served the community for over 40 years before an arson fire in September 2009 destroyed the attached restroom structure and damaged the stage. After the fire, volunteers repaired the stage for $818 in materials. What followed was a 16-year process conducted almost entirely out of public view.
Source: Council minutes, April 5, 2010.
What the City Administrator Said

March 23, 2026 Budget Workshop. City Administrator Bill Belknap presented the FY2027 financial outlook to City Council. He did not mention the stage. He did not need to. The numbers speak for themselves.

"Before we even look at those, we're 50 to 80,000 in the hole."

On the FY2027 structural deficit before any non-personnel inflation is counted.

"We've had seven positions that we've held vacant since 2023... We won't have funding for bringing those."

Three years of frozen positions. No restoration in sight.

"We're going to have to give up a patrol position in order to retain that."

On losing the forensic detective after Attorney General funding was cut.

"Don't want this to be a downer, but... We have to be really mindful of what our limitations are."

The stage draws from the Capital Fund, not the General Fund. But capital accumulations are discretionary. Every dollar allocated to the stage is a dollar not allocated to roads, restrooms, or other underfunded capital needs.
Source: City of Moscow FY2027 Budget Workshop transcript, March 23, 2026
Art space quantities on the proposed stage showing 201 SF, 111 SF, and 79 SF mural wall areas
Art space quantities on the proposed stage. ~782 SF total mural area. Source: Moscow ECP Stage 3rd St. Views & Mural Wall Areas
30% Design Progress Submittal cover sheet
30% Design Progress Submittal, July 10, 2025. Job #24035.
Design West Architects prepared the original 2010 concept plan, the 30% design submittal, and won the final design-through-construction contract. No other firm held the same project knowledge before the RFQ was issued.
Source: Design Agreement, December 18, 2025, Attachment A, Section 1.C.
$885K
Budgeted for stage replacement
Source: FY2026 Budget, Capital Fund
0
Public hearings held
Source: Council records 2010-2026
18
Non-public meetings
Source: East City Park Stage Records
3-3
Council vote (tie, mayor broke it)
Source: Council vote record
$50,000-$80,000 structural deficit before discretionary inflation

New annual revenue: $315,000-$355,000. Payroll increases alone: ~$408,000. The city is underwater before it pays for anything beyond salaries. The stage draws from the same finite pool.

Source: FY2027 Budget Workshop, March 23, 2026
What Else Could $885,000 Fund?
Capital-to-Capital, Apples-to-Apples

On March 23, 2026, the City shelved the $26M Downtown Streetscape project. Downtown got $250K for design only. The park stage got $885K for full construction. Here is what the city cannot afford while building a stage:

$701,925
D Street Repair
FY2027. Grant-dependent.
Grind and inlay, Main to Hayes. Serves daily commuters and downtown access.
$885,000
East City Park Stage
Full construction funded.
Serves a handful of annual events. 18 closed meetings. 0 public hearings.
$26,000,000
Downtown Streetscape
Shelved. $250K design only. Serves the entire city.
$886,000
Mountain View TAP Pathway (White Ave to Hwy 8)
Grant-funded. Nearly identical cost to the stage.
$773,400
South Main Pedestrian Underpass
Killed. Deemed infeasible. Stage costs $112K more.
$124,581
Oylear Field Restroom
Deferred to 2034.
TBD
Moscow Farmer's Market Funding
Councilmember Blankenship cited defunding as a budget possibility. The stage could fund the market that brings commerce to Moscow.
$830,165
Moser Park Playground
CIP 2030. Project 112-025. Costs less than the stage.
$298,513
Lola Clyde Park Restroom
CIP 2029. Project 110-023. Three of these for the price of one stage.
$880,738
Lola Clyde Park Roadway & Parking
CIP 2026. Project 110-023. Nearly identical cost to the stage.
$614,383
Ghormley Park Lights Replacement
CIP 2031. Project 101-033. $270K less than the stage.
$316,069
Hamilton Aquatics Center Pool Replaster
CIP 2030. Project 110-028. Less than half the stage cost.
$311,841
Berman Creekside Park Restroom
CIP 2032. Project 113-027. Less than half the stage cost.
$205,595
Dog Park Grounds Rehabilitation
CIP 2033. Project 109-025. Less than a quarter of the stage cost.
The Stage Was Never a Strategic Initiative

In Fall 2022, the City conducted a formal scoring process to identify its highest-priority strategic initiatives. The City Administrator told Council the process ensures "our finite resources" are focused on "our most important issues." Thirteen initiatives made the list:

1. Alternative Water Supply
2. Fire/EMS Staffing
3. Emergency Radios
4. City Shop
5. Street Maintenance
6. Downtown Improvements
7. Affordable Housing
8. Staff Recruitment
9. Urban Forestry
10. Multimodal Transportation
11. Playfield Development
12. Gateway Aesthetics
13. Economic Development

The East City Park Stage is not on this list.

It was never submitted, scored, or ranked through the process the City Administrator described. The same administrator who told Council "we really do need to be focused on a fairly limited number of items" is overseeing an $885,000 stage project that bypassed his own prioritization framework.

Source: Strategic Planning Update 2026; FY2027 Budget Workshop transcript, March 23, 2026
What Moscow loses while the stage gets built:
D Street stays broken. Downtown stays shelved. Seven staff positions stay empty. Oylear Field kids use portable toilets until 2034. The Farmer's Market could lose funding. But the stage gets built.
These are facts documented in public records obtained through official records requests. They are observations about the process, not legal conclusions.
Common Questions

"The stage is old and needs replacing."

It was repaired by volunteers for $818 after the 2010 fire and is still in use today. The question is not whether to replace it. The question is whether $885,000 from the Capital Fund is the right approach when the city cannot fund D Street repairs, has shelved Downtown, and has 7 frozen staff positions.

"The money is already budgeted."

Budgets can be amended. That is what the public hearing process is for. The August 17 formal budget hearing is the place to request a reallocation. No public hearing has been held on this project.

"This is just political."

Every fact on this page is sourced to public records. The source documents are linked above. Read them yourself and draw your own conclusions.

What to Say

Copy this and send it. Or write your own. Either way, show up in their inbox.

Dear Mayor Lewis and Moscow City Council,

I am writing to request that the Council pause the $885,000 East City Park Stage project and redirect those capital funds to higher-priority needs: D Street repair, the Downtown Streetscape, and deferred park restrooms.

The stage was never part of the City's 13 strategic initiatives. It was approved on a 3-3 tie with no public hearing. Eighteen closed-door meetings shaped this project while the public was excluded.

The City Administrator told Council on March 23 that we are $50,000-$80,000 underwater before discretionary spending. This is not the time for an $885,000 passion project. Please hold a public hearing before any construction contract is awarded.

Respectfully,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
Your Voice Matters

Attend the next City Council meeting. Mondays, 7:00 PM, Moscow City Hall (206 E 3rd Street).

Email the Council: council@ci.moscow.id.us

Request the records: Moscow Public Records Request Form

View the source documents: All Records Received (Dropbox)

Share this page.

Promised vs. Delivered

On June 17, 2024, City Council reached consensus on three commitments before proceeding with the stage project. Here is what the records show happened:

Source: Council minutes, June 17, 2024.
June 17, 2024 Council Consensus What the Records Show
"More community outreach" 6 private meetings, 1 comment-card-only open house (14 responses), 3 unadvertised display boards
"Community input" No survey, no formal Q&A, no referendum, no public hearing
"Financial comparison of locations" No alternative site analysis found in any reviewed public record
Full Timeline (2009-2026) - Click to expand

From arson fire to construction contract. Each key decision point in the record.

September 2009
Arson fire destroys restrooms at East City Park. The attached Peter Basoa Stage, built by community volunteers, is partially damaged. A 16-year process begins.
February 2010 Closed Meeting
Invite-only stakeholder meeting with City Parks, City Arts, and event representatives. Decision made to explore a new design rather than rebuild the original. No public notice issued.
April 2010
Community volunteers stabilize the stage structure. $409.16 in donated supplies, $409.16 in City matching funds, plus donated materials from Moscow Building Supply. Volunteer crew of 16 people does the work.
Source: Council minutes, April 5, 2010.
August 16, 2010 Consent Agenda (No Discussion)
Council approves Design West conceptual design contract on consent agenda. No discussion.
August-September 2010 Invite-Only Closed Meeting
Three invite-only stakeholder meetings (Aug 18, Aug 25, Sep 15). One Council Open House followed by Executive Session (Idaho Code 67-2345(1)(c)). Design boards at Farmer's Market, Sep 4-11.
September 20, 2010
Council presentation. Public voting results: 95 total votes (Option A: 24%, Option B: 54%, Option C: 22%). Council sends project back for cost review. Initial estimates range from $495,150 to $698,925.
Source: Design West presentation.
February 2011 Consent Agenda (No Discussion)
Council approves two grant applications on consent agenda. No discussion. NEA "Our Town" (up to $250,000) and Steele-Reese Foundation (up to $150,000). Both fail. The failure is disclosed in one sentence in a later document with no public council discussion.
Source: Council minutes, February 22, 2011.
2012
Council declares restroom a priority. Stage deferred. Design West awarded $17,000 restroom contract. $17,000
Source: Council minutes, August 20, 2012.
November 5, 2012 Expedited (No Committee Review)
Restroom bid awarded ($167,000, Big Sky Development). Normal committee review bypassed at Council request.
Source: Council minutes, November 5, 2012.
April 5, 2013 - 2023
Restroom completed. Community uses portable toilets for approximately 3.5 years. The stage appears as a CIP line item from FY2017 through FY2020 with no dollar amount, then reappears in CIP 2025-2034 as Project 108-024 at $360,500. No action taken for 11 years.
Source: CIP 2025-2034.
May 6, 2024
Design West paid $18,700 under Professional Services Agreement. Scope and authorization basis not fully documented in the public record. $18,700
Source: City payment records, May 6, 2024.
June 17, 2024 Promise Broken
Council reaches consensus for "more community outreach, community input, and financial comparison of locations" before proceeding.
Source: Council minutes, June 17, 2024.
November 15, 2024 Closed Meeting
Stakeholder meeting described by a former Arts Commission member as "private, closed, unpublicized."
Complete stakeholder list showing 10 organizations
The complete stakeholder list. 10 organizations. 2 are City staff. Source: East City Park Stage Records PDF, p. 80
January 23, 2025 Invite-Only Closed Meeting
Stakeholder Meeting #2. Invite-only. Second formal stakeholder session. (See attendance table below.)
March 6, 2025 Limited Public Input
Open House at City Hall. Comment cards only, no Q&A. 14 responses received. No public deliberation.
April-May 2025 Unadvertised Events
Display boards at April Artwalk, Renaissance Fair, and Farmers Market. Per a former Arts Commission member: "not publicly advertised."
November 25, 2025
Design West fee proposal: $72,700 for design through construction. Project estimated at $800,000-$850,000. $72,700 proposed
Source: Riddle Letter 11-25-25.
December 15, 2025
Council unanimously approves $72,700 design contract. No public hearing held. $72,700 approved
March 25, 2026 Invite-Only Closed Meeting
60% Design Stakeholder Meeting. Designated "invitation only." General public excluded.
Who Got a Say? (Stakeholder Table)
The Stakeholder List

These are the ten organizations invited to participate in stakeholder meetings.

Source: East City Park Stage Records, p. 80.
Two of the ten listed stakeholders (Parks Department, Arts Department) are City staff. The general public, park neighbors, and taxpayers were not included on this list.
# Organization Representative Nov 15, 2024 Jan 23, 2025
1Rendezvous in the ParkDaryle FairclothAttendedAttended
2Renaissance FairLuAnn ScottAttendedAttended
3Earth DayStevie Steely-JohnsonAttendedDid NOT attend
4Hemp FestArlene FalconAttendedAttended
5Palouse PrideKathy SpragueAttendedAttended
6Moscow Community BandAlbert MillerDid NOT attendNo record
7Festival DanceRachel WinchesterAttendedAttended
8Latah Recovery FestivalSam MartinetAttendedDid NOT attend
9Parks DepartmentDavid SchottAttendedAttended
10Arts DepartmentMegan CherryAttendedAttended
All 18 Closed Meetings
18 Non-Public or Restricted Decision Points

A minimum of 18 private, closed, or invite-only meetings have been identified in the public record between 2010 and 2026. This list is drawn from council minutes, City records, and direct statements from meeting participants.

This table includes invite-only stakeholder meetings, consent agenda placements without discussion, expedited approvals, and other decision points where public participation was restricted or absent.
# Date Meeting Type Notes
1Feb 2010Invite-only stakeholderCity Parks, City Arts, event reps. No public notice.
2Jun 16, 2010Internal selection committeeUnnamed committee reviewed RFQ responses. Members not disclosed.
3Aug 9, 2010Administrative Committee reviewDesign West contract reviewed before consent agenda placement.
4Aug 18, 2010Stakeholder Meeting #1Invite-only, 12:00-2:00 pm.
5Aug 25, 2010Stakeholder Meeting #2Invite-only, 1:30-3:30 pm.
6Sep 7, 2010Executive Session11:10-11:46 pm, Idaho Code 67-2345(1)(c). Topic not public.
7Sep 15, 2010Stakeholder Meeting #3Invite-only, 12:30-1:30 pm.
82011Grant application approvalsBoth grant applications placed on consent agenda. No discussion.
92012Scope reduction decisionRestroom-only direction set. Stage deferred without public hearing.
10Nov 5, 2012Expedited bid awardNormal committee review bypassed at Council request.
11May 6, 2024Design West PSA$18,700 paid. Scope and authorization basis not fully documented in public record.
12Nov 14, 2024Individual meetingCity staff met individually with Rachel Winchester (Festival Dance).
13Nov 15, 2024Stakeholder MeetingDescribed by a former Arts Commission member as "private, closed, unpublicized."
14Jan 23, 2025Stakeholder MeetingInvite-only. Second formal stakeholder meeting (see attendance table).
15Mar 6, 2025Open House (restricted format)Comment cards only, no Q&A. Not a public hearing. 14 responses.
16Nov 25, 2025Fee proposal meetingWarnick (Design West) to Riddle (City). Not a public meeting.
17Dec 15, 2025Council approval (no hearing)$72,700 contract approved unanimously. No dedicated public comment period.
18Mar 25, 202660% Design ReviewDesignated "invitation only." General public excluded.
Follow the Money (Full Financial Record)
Financial Record
Date Item Amount Source
Apr 2010Emergency repairs (donated)$409.16Council minutes
Apr 2010Emergency repairs (City share)$409.16Council minutes
2010Insurance proceeds received$58,000Council minutes
2010Conceptual design - basic estimate$495,150Design West presentation
2010Conceptual design - enhanced estimate$698,925Design West presentation
FY2012Budget allocation (donations)$242,000FY2012 Budget
2011Grant applications (both failed)Up to $400,000Council minutes
2012Design West - restroom contract$17,000Council minutes
Oct 2012Big Sky Development - restroom low bid$167,000Council minutes
CIP 2025-2034Stage replacement estimate (Project 108-024)$360,500CIP document
May 6, 2024Design West PSA$18,700City records
Dec 15, 2025Design West - design through construction$72,700Council vote
FY2026Stage replacement budget (Capital Fund)$885,000FY2026 Budget
FY20261% Public Art (shared with City Shop)$150,000FY2026 Budget (Art Fund)
Mar 2026T-Mobile grant applicationUp to $50,000Grant Review Form
CurrentStage rental fee$26.75 / shelterFee Schedule
Design West total paid to date$91,400($18,700 + $72,700)
Cost escalation: CIP to FY2026 budget+$524,500 (+145%)$360,500 to $885,000
Cost escalation: 2010 basic to FY2026 budget+$389,850 (+79%)$495,150 to $885,000
The Design Contract (Details)
Agreement for Professional Design and Construction Management Services
Contract Terms
  • Parties: City of Moscow / Design West Architects, P.A. (254 E. Main St., Pullman, WA)
  • Amount: Not to exceed $72,700
  • Signed: December 18, 2025 (electronic signatures December 17, 2025)
  • Signatories: Ned Warnick (Design West), Bill Belknap (City Administrator), Laurie Hopkins (City Clerk)
Notary page is blank. The notary acknowledgment section was not completed at the time of execution.
Fee Breakdown
PhaseAmountPercentage
Schematic / Design Development$18,17525%
Construction Documents$29,08040%
Bidding or Negotiation$7,27010%
Construction Phase$18,17525%
Total$72,700100%
Project Schedule (per contract)
MilestoneTarget Date
Program verificationJanuary 30, 2026
Design developmentFebruary 27, 2026
60% Construction DocumentsMarch 20, 2026
90% Construction DocumentsApril 10, 2026
Final bid documentsMay 10, 2026
ConstructionSeptember 7, 2026 - March 31, 2027
Selection Method

Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS/RFQ). Design West prepared the original 2010 concept plan and the 30% design set, then won the RFQ for the full design-through-construction contract. The contract acknowledges this: "based upon the Concept Plan prepared by CONSULTANT under a prior separate contract." No other firm had the same project history before the RFQ was issued.

The listed hourly rates are "valid through December 2025." Work extends to March 2027.

Source: Design Agreement, December 18, 2025, Attachment A, Section 1.C.
Public Opposition
You are not alone. Five opposition letters published in the Moscow-Pullman Daily News. A former Arts Commissioner's signed letter with 15 co-signers. A 3-3 council tie. Even the incoming Mayor called the design "soulless" during a City Council meeting. This is not one person complaining. This is a pattern of residents being ignored.
Key Concerns Raised
  1. Cost is excessive ($885,000 for a park stage).
  2. No formal public hearing has been held.
  3. Design described as aesthetically poor. Mayor Lewis called it "soulless" during a City Council meeting. Multiple residents compared it unfavorably to institutional architecture.
  4. The original stage was built by community volunteers and served for over 40 years.
  5. A portable stage alternative (used by Rendezvous in the Park) was not adequately evaluated.
  6. A community-led volunteer rebuild was proposed but received no documented response.
Source: FY2026 Budget, Capital Fund; East City Park Stage Records, public correspondence; Open House comment cards, March 6, 2025.
Signed Letter from Former Arts Commissioner

A former Moscow Arts Commission member submitted a signed letter with 15 co-signers to City Council. Co-signers include: Walter Hesford, Lynn, Logan Morris, Alan Rose, Nicole Rose, Laura Putsche, Ken Faunce, Jo Hamilton, Joanne Reece, Holly McCollister, Kathy Dawes, Fran Rodriguez, Elizabeth Hillman, Dale Gentry, and Monique Lillard.

Source: letter from former Arts Commission member, December 13, 2024; East City Park Stage Records, p. 28.

Letters to the Editor

Opposition letters were published in the Moscow-Pullman Daily News on:

  • December 20, 2025
  • January 10, 2026
  • January 24, 2026
  • March 7, 2026
  • March 28, 2026
Template Responses to Residents

Council member Bryce Blankenship sent nearly identical form-letter responses to at least four residents who wrote individually to oppose the project. All four letters were dated December 23, 2025, with nearly identical content across all responses.

Source: East City Park Stage Records, email correspondence to Anne, Bethany Mock, Emily West, John Slagboom.
IT Email Failure

Two newly seated council members (Scott Sumner and Sage McCetich) were not receiving emails sent to council@ci.moscow.id.us due to an IT configuration error. At least 9 constituent emails were missed during a critical period of public input.

Source: Binder 2, Chris Caylor IT confirmation email, January 2026.
East City Park site and circulation plan showing proposed stage location
Site and Circulation Plan. Source: Design West Architects, East City Stage Design Review Deck

Mayor Lewis voted against this project. Councilmembers Holmes, Sumner, and McCetich are new. This is their first real budget fight. The question for Moscow: will the new council honor the promises the old council broke?

Your Voice Matters

Attend the next City Council meeting. Mondays, 7:00 PM, Moscow City Hall (206 E 3rd Street).

Email the Council: council@ci.moscow.id.us

Request the records: Moscow Public Records Request Form

View the source documents: All Records Received (Dropbox)

Share this page.

WINDOW TO ACT
Apr 10All department budgets due to City Administrator Jun 12Proposed budget published to City Council Jul 7, 8:30 AMPublic budget workshop (attend this) Aug 17Formal budget hearing (your last chance for public comment) Sep 2026Stage construction scheduled to begin
About This Report

Every fact on this page comes from official City of Moscow public records obtained through formal records requests under the Idaho Public Records Act (Idaho Code 74-102). Source documents are available for public review.

Verify Everything: Read the Source Documents

Tell Council: Stop the $885K Stage